DB
Back to Articles

Why JetBrains Still Beats AI in Debugging

June 14, 2025
5 min read
Debugger

JetBrains tools are remarkably effective for debugging—more precise, faster, and less distracting than most AI code assistants. Here’s why.

"Sometimes, the best assistant is the one that just gets out of your way."

As someone who works across AI, code, and hardware, I’ve used everything—from JetBrains IDEs like PyCharm and IntelliJ to modern AI copilots. But every time I’m knee-deep in a debugging session, I find myself reaching back to JetBrains. Here's why it still wins.

🧠 1. Instant Contextual Insight

Hovering over a variable or function in JetBrains gives me the full context—its definition, type, documentation, and references. No prompts, no lag. Just instant understanding.

Meanwhile, AI assistants often require verbose prompts or generate explanations that feel generic or overly verbose.

🚨 2. Reliable Error Highlighting

JetBrains flags real errors—not hallucinations. AI can sometimes "imagine" issues or miss real bugs unless explicitly asked. JetBrains provides me with linting, inspections, and suggestions in real-time, without any hallucinations.

🔍 3. Real Debugging, Not Guesswork

Setting breakpoints, watching variables, evaluating expressions—JetBrains gives control. AI tools mostly suggest fixes without understanding runtime behavior. That’s a huge gap when fixing deep logic bugs.

4. Refactoring That Works

JetBrains refactoring (like Rename, Extract Method, etc.) is reliable, project-wide, and integrated. AI can sometimes help rename a function, but JetBrains will handle imports, references, and type signatures automatically.

🎯 5. No Guesswork, No Prompts

With AI, you often spend time crafting a good prompt. JetBrains doesn’t need one. You just click or hover, and it tells you what’s wrong and how to fix it.

🧩 6. AI Is Great for Suggestions—Not Debugging

Don't get me wrong—AI shines when I'm looking for boilerplate code or exploring new APIs. But when I need to trace a bug, optimize a query, or navigate large codebases, JetBrains is still my weapon of choice.

🛠️ When I Use Both

I use AI assistants when:

  • Writing boilerplate
  • Exploring unknown libraries
  • Generating quick test cases

But I rely on JetBrains when:

  • Debugging logic issues
  • Refactoring across modules
  • Navigating large, multi-file projects

💭 Final Thought

AI is catching up, and the combination of AI + JetBrains will probably be the future. But today, when deadlines are tight and bugs are real—JetBrains is still the champ.